Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Donald Smith on December 3, 2015 at 11:18

The Planning Proposal P13-03626LBE  was approved with D1 use (Doctors Surgery) subject to conditions

Recommendation
8.1 In accordance with Regulations 3 of the Town and Country Planning General
Regulations 1992, planning permission be deemed to be GRANTED subject
to conditions in summary:
1. C60 - Approved plans
2. CO7 - External materials
3. CO9 - External surfacing materials
4. C11 - Details of enclosures
5. Sustainable Urban Drainage Scheme
6. Hours of opening (8am-8pm Mondays to Saturdays).
7. C17 – Details of landscaping
8. C59 - Cycle storage
9. C19 - Refuse storage
10. C30 - Restriction of open storage

11. The development shall not be occupied until a car park management strategy
has been submitted to and approved by the LPA and implemented in
accordance with the approved details. It is essential that the strategy ensures
the car park is made available only for visitors to the library and health centre.
The strategy may include but not be limited to Pay and Display bays or a
physical barrier at the entrance.
12. (empty in original report)
13. Reason: To ensure the car park is only used by visitors to the surgery or the
library.
14. C49 - Restricted Use Class (Doctors Surgery) only
15. Energy Performance Certificate
16. Energy Efficiency
17. BREAAM
18. C51a Time limit

The Planning database records no application to either extend the use or the Monday Saturday hours 8am to 8pm

Attachments:

• P13-03626LBE - PALMERS GREEN LIBRARY SOUTHGATE TOWN HALL 251 GREEN LANES LONDON N13 4EY.pdf, 1.5 MB
• P13-03626LBE-PLANNING_STATEMENT-1350923.pdf, 139 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Donald Smith on December 3, 2015 at 13:03

As the GVA advertisement makes clear use other than Clasas D1 (Doctors Surgery) is subject to planning permission 

Attachments:

• GVA advert for Library space.pdf, 231 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alan Sitkin on December 4, 2015 at 0:17

More accurately, we wanted and sought a practice. No doctor chose to move into the new facilities. We can't dictate that. So what do you do then?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Donald Smith on December 4, 2015 at 12:49

CllCllr Sitkin writes:

More accurately, we wanted and sought a practice. No doctor chose to move into the new facilities. We can't dictate that. So what do you do then?

All very good but "more accurately"  whilst one or two Bowes Ward Councillors may have been told this at sometime, and a resident has told me  that Cllr Bambos Charalambous had "mentioned" this at Palmers Green Forum; what conclusion am I expected to reach when the Officer's Part 1 report for Decision at Page 2 (reproduced below) 

neither makes no mention of this claim at all, nor any recent discussion with NHS England (London) Director of Primary Care Commissioning , David Sturgeon, mailto:david.sturgeon@nhs.net to seek a resolution of the aspiration by leasing the property through NHS Property Co and appointing an employed GP or using the space for provision of out sourced services through In Health, or as a base for staff operating the newly introduced service NorthMid@Home being provided by HealthcareatHome

If I was conducting a prospective purchase of one of the 19 apartment flats in Prytaneum Court (Southgate Town Hall) I would assign a different financial value to the prospective property purchase if the adjoining development was a User Class D1 Doctors Surgery rather than a User Class D4/D5 development with a different demographic profile such as Fit4Less. My legal solicitor conducting a "personal search" would appear prime-facie currently to only gain the information under the 2013 Planning Permission P13-03626LBE.

• ▶ Reply