Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Susan Walsh on August 26, 2013 at 14:43

Hi Cemal,

I would just like to add a comment here.  Not too long ago Club Planet kept us awake until the early hours of the morning.  When my husband popped in to talk to you about it you were very rude and dismissive. In fact your words were "it's my place and I can have private parties whenever I want to".  I am not sure that this is appropriate behavior towards a member of the community. Newcomers to the community should be sensitive to their fellow neighbours.

It is not nice to have people wandering down our street in the early hours very drunk and loud.  Our objection to the Funky Lounge is as Lindsey pointed out, another licensed premises will only add to the existing problems.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Administrator on June 25, 2013 at 10:20

News from the local press:  Enfield Police have officialy requested that the licensing committee should reject the application for a premises licence for "Funky Lounge" 

The full press story can be read online; the application will be decided by Enfield council’s licensing sub-committee on Wednesday July 3.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Geoff Walsh on June 25, 2013 at 16:41

Can this be true ?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alan Sitkin on June 27, 2013 at 0:16

Yep. I'll be representing on the night. You can guess what we'll be saying!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard McKeever on July 4, 2013 at 7:28

A hearing of Enfield Council's licensing sub-committee yesterday refused the application to sell alcohol.
The premises can still be operated as a coffee and ice cream bar.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by R on July 4, 2013 at 10:31

A positive result for the community as a whole me thinks.
Out of interest, does anyone know how soon would they be able to make another such application (if they wished to ) or is that the end of the matter?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alan Sitkin on July 4, 2013 at 11:10

That wasn't specified at the meeting yesterday (morning). The panel simply refused. Took them about 30 minutes to deliberate. 

But it's what we asked for so that's good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Geoff Walsh on July 4, 2013 at 22:01

what worries me is that they are spending a small fortune on the refurb of the building.....why would they do that if they were to get no returns

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page