Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Daniel Cowan on November 22, 2013 at 13:08

There is some new information for an application for 100 Myddleton Road this week, for 2 conventional (but very small) flats and an improved shopfront. This was mentioned by Lindsey (above), but it now has the plans and elevations. It still means setting in stone the loss of a potential shop. See here:

 

HGY/2013/2292

http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/Applica...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lindsey Berthoud on November 23, 2013 at 12:36

Thanks Daniel, have commented on both. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Toby Nation on December 9, 2013 at 8:25

Hi,

I know it's been posted about before but there's currently a live application on Haringey's site for 51 Myddleton Road (HGY/2013/2392).

It's listed as permission to retain 5 flats - which we all seem to have appealed against before. However there seems to still be a decision pending on the request to convert to three flats (HGY/2013/1935).  

I'm going to object, but does anyone know where this has got to?

Thanks

T

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lindsey Berthoud on December 10, 2013 at 8:56

Right, 2392 is new, dated 14 November. Hadn't spotted it before. "5 flats" - that's really pushing the boundaries of the definition of a flat. Have you seen how tiny they are in the drawing?

The application states there is "strong demand for small units". Is there stronger demand for decent sized homes? 

If you look back at our comments on app 1935 to convert to 3 flats, enforcement action has been taken on this property, as it was turned into 5 units without permission. Current lawful use is 2 flats, one 3 bed and one 2 bed.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jennifer Taylor on December 10, 2013 at 7:57

It is totally unacceptable and outrageous. If English Heritage are prepared to give major funds to the street, will they not take action on their investment? Suggest a visit by them to see this as it's happening - now.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lindsey Berthoud on January 22, 2014 at 17:39

This is interesting - Brent Council takes a stand on 'beds in sheds'

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nell Riches on January 22, 2014 at 20:43

Goodness that building looks familiar! Well, Haringey... if Brent can knock it down, surely we can too! We spotted Lindsey.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lindsey Berthoud on January 31, 2014 at 14:15

Expect you've also had an email today about this one going to Appeal on two counts, both the refusal of planning permission and the subsequent enforcement notice. We are invited to comment on the appeals - you can send a letter in triplicate or do it online: 

Dear Sir/Madam

Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Location: 97 Myddleton RoadN22 8NE

Proposal: Retention of refurbished recording studio / live work unit

Appeal by: MrGeorge Souris

Appeal Reference: APP/Y5420C/13/2209872 & 2209869

Start Date: 27/01/2014

I am writing to inform you that an appeal has been made to the Secretary of State in respect of the above site.

The appeal is being made because the Council refused planning permission for the above development.

The Council also served an Enforcement Notice for the unauthorised erection of a detached single storey structure in the

rear garden and its use for self-contained residential purposes.

The Council’s reference numbers for the above appeals are: APP/2013/00454 and HGY/2013/1626.

The Planning Inspectorate has linked both appeals and the timetable is the same for both appeals.

The appeal is to be decided by the Planning Inspectorate, a separate national body, on the basis of written statements that will be submitted by the Council and by the appellant.

If you wish to send your comments to the Planning Inspectorate so that they can be taken into account, please do so in writing to The Planning Inspectorate, 3/01 Kite Wing, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Temple Quay, Bristol, BS1 6PN.

Any comments you may have made to the Council at the planning application stage will be forwarded to the Inspectorate by the Council and they will be taken into account by the Inspector when deciding the appeal. If you do write to the

Inspectorate, please include the appeal reference and send three copies within four weeks of the start date shown above. If your letter is not received within this deadline it will not usually be seen by the Inspector and will be returned. You will only be informed of the result of this appeal if you write to the Planning Inspector at the above address and specifically request to be notified of the result.

You can now view and comment on submitted appeals online through the Government’s Planning Portal website at www.planningportal.gov.uk. Please search by only using the 7 digit number towards the end of the reference. You may obtain a copy of the booklet “Guide to taking part in planning appeals” from The Planning Inspectorate at the above address, or download it from the website at www.planning-inspectorate.gov.uk. If you are not the owner of the property you occupy, perhaps you would be kind enough to bring this letter to their attention as they may also wish to make comments.

Yours faithfully

Stephen Kelly

Assistant Director

Planning Service

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lindsey Berthoud on January 31, 2014 at 14:11

Walked past 122 MR this week and through the open door the ground floor looked completely gutted. Is that something to do with an old planning application? It's not something covered by the current application, which has yet to be decided on.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Emel youssof on February 1, 2014 at 15:46

Hi. Apparently have dug up whole basement looking for a leak. And in that quest have dug down some 6 feet and lower than the original foundations, exposing the dry cleaners at 124 .....with no party wall award or engineers calculations.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lindsey Berthoud on February 2, 2014 at 8:53

Thanks for the update. I also had an email via Daniel saying: 

"She has contacted Haringey and they are putting an injunction in place to stop the works. Lees builders have been round to shore up the building to get it into a safe state.

She thinks the shop will be used as another letting agent."

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Emel youssof on February 3, 2014 at 13:28

Building control are now involved so we confident that all will now be done correctly (workwise that is). Correct procedures have been tenuous but we just want the works to go forward and 124 be brought back to structural soundness.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• Next ›
• Page